dvjorge;39046 wrote: You are convinced that fruits caused your infection, and I am convinced they don’t. So, we will never agree with it.
What chock me is the time you have been posting and learning about this syndrome and still you think this way.Again, CRC isn’t caused by dietary habits but by immunologic problems that may be linked to many things as you probably already know.
Oh my god, Jorge. I’m actually agreeing with you and you’re still arguing the point with me. I can’t believe you, man.
Do you see the statement below? You posted it in case you don’t remember.
Quote: food increases the infection one time it is latent
And then I wrote this part, “Latent: dormant or undeveloped but able to develop normally under suitable conditions.”
And then my dear friend, I agreed with you.
Now how about reading my entire post this time before you decide to disagree with anything I write, and maybe you’ll see that I agreed with your statement, in fact, I’ve always agreed with this part of the Candida development. They can go dormant, I’ve written about this before myself, but the “infection” as you called it doesn’t develop and may never develop into a physical Candida fungal infestation without a “suitable condition:” Like your own quote states, the suitable condition can be a food source. Read your own post, Jorge.
So it looks like I was spot on even more than I thought, it really is about semantics with you. We have to write our own experiences in ‘your’ words, or you’ll disagree with us.