wonderlover;50420 wrote: no. chelation was in 2006. Amalgam removal around 2007 i think.
I had oral chelation.
All of the “mercury toxicity” stuff happened years ago.
A LOT of places … I mean A LOT of places i’ve read have said just the opposite … that blood tests are the ONLY reliable test for heavy metal toxicity and hair tests are extrememly unreliable. Just a simple google search brings up hundreds of conflicting reports. And what’s even more frustrating is that the highest rated Neurologists in my state completely negate the idea of mercury toxicity. who knows what to believe.
Even oral chelation is harmful when you still have amalgams in your mouth.
I understand that there’s a lot of conflicting information out there. To be honest, it’s a very time-consuming and frustrating process trying to sift through all of the information out there in an attempt to find the truth. It doesn’t help that most of us are sick and brain-fogged while trying to do all this.
Really, you can’t take any one person’s word for it, including mine. Ultimately, it’s up to you to weigh different opinions and advice and come to your own decisions. I will say though that the vast majority of mainstream doctors are incredibly ignorant when it comes to mercury toxicity. Even most alternative/holistic docs don’t know how to properly treat it, hence all the bad protocols like IV chelation out there.