I certainly wouldn’t describe myself as angered.
The validity of any findings should be grounded in evidence rather than belief. I don’t see any evidence here. Rather I just see a line of reasoning where conclusions don’t necessarily follow the preceding statements. It is full of suggestion and is, as eluded to earlier, biased.
Again, I’m not necessarily saying she is wrong. I am just saying given the actual words she has written I have no way of knowing the validity of her statement. Moreover, it is certainly not the prevailing view.