dvjorge;55900 wrote: Anecdotal evidence has value even if there isn’t scientific documentation about that matter. At the end, what candida sufferers WANT is to win this battle not to demonstrate if mercury is the real cause or not. This forum isn’t about scientific proof but to bring help and hope to those who needs to recover their former health.
Sounds nice, but you only address feelings. Not facts.
If there would be so much anecdotal evidence, then that would be a scientific proof! After all, science starts by looking what happens after you do X. You only have to look well, to count, and to report – that’s all.
Science often starts by collecting a lot of anecdotal evidence. Therefore, I do not understand your statement that “lots of anecdotal evidence are no scientific proof”.
Could you please explain?