I normally do not use tactics that I consider detestable. In this case, however, user impossible has repeatedly given explicit permission to use such tactics. So, here we go:
Readers, please not that user impossible is a manipulator. He is being paid handsomely by Al Qaeda.
It is a well-known fact that Al Qaeda tries to destroy our civilization by all means. They have seen in their own countries what happens to innocent children when you do not protect them against deadly diseases through a simple, harmless vaccination. This gave them the idea to attack American children through the same tactic.
As they cannot stop doctors from protecting American children, they target the parents. They hire shills like user impossible to spread FUD, which stands for Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.
User impossible therefore visits various forums under various usernames. Whereever he comes, he spreads the lie that vaccination causes autism, candida, and numerous other big problems.
Al Qaeda’s goal is, of course, to frighten parents enough to not protect their children anymore. They only need the vaccination rate to drop by as little as 5% to make infectious diseases sweep through the country, killing lots of innocent children. That would be a much larger success then any terrorist attack upto this moment.
Shills like user impossible receive enticing amounts of money to spread this FUD. It’s all part of a co-ordinated attack against our children.
It really feels kind of strange writing down such things. It’s not me, really. Consider this a favour to user impossible, who has repeatedly and explicitly stated that he considers this a normal, even advisable method of communication.
Dear impossible, how does it feel that I’m following your example? Shall we continue this way, which was chosen by you? Or should we better revert to more respectful behaviour?
My choice is clear. However, treating each other respectfully can only be done of both parties agree on doing so. I would appreciate hearing your opinion on this subject.